references
References

  1. Alfredsson Ågren, K., Kjellberg, A., & Hemmingsson, H. (2020). Access to and use of the Internet among adolescents and young adults with intellectual disabilities in everyday settings. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 45(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2018.1518898

  2. Ali, M., Gomes, L. M., Azab, N., Sorour, M. K., & Kimura, H. (2023). Panic buying and fake news in urban vs. rural England: A case study of Twitter during COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122598

  3. Amazon Web Services. (October 17, 2022). What is preventing low digital intensity businesses in the United Kingdom (UK) from using more digital technology? [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved August 31, 2023, from https://www-statista-com.salford.idm.oclc.org/statistics/1398121/impediments-to-digital-technology-use-by-low-digital-intensity-businesses-uk/

  4. Barrantes, R., & Vargas, E. (2019). Different paths and same destinations? An analysis of the convergence in Internet usage patterns between different age groups. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 85(6), e12105. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12105

  5. Carlisle, S., Ivanov, S., & Dijkmans, C. (2023). The digital skills divide: Evidence from the European tourism industry. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 240–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-07-2020-0114

  6. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 201-222). John Wiley and Sons Limited.

  7. Choudrie, J., Zamani, E., & Obuekwe, C. (2022). Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: An Organisational Qualitative Study. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1355–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10126-8

  8. Deloitte. (August 1, 2019). In which of the following ways do you and other members of your household access the internet while at home? [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved August 29, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1084795/methods-of-accessing-internet-at-home-uk/

  9. Devi, E.T., Wibisono, D., Mulyono, N.B. and Fitriati, R. (2023), "Designing an information-sharing system to improve collaboration culture: a soft systems methodology approach in the digital service creation process", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 1240-1269. https://doi-org.salford.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2022-0294

  10. Diaz-Leon, J. A., Larraza-Mendiluze, E., Gallego, O. A., & Arruarte, A. (2023). The Challenge of Introducing Informatics Topics From an Early Age in Peru During the Pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3260468

  11. Eynon, R. (2023). Utilising a Critical Realist Lens to Conceptualise Digital Inequality: The Experiences of Less Well-Off Internet Users. Social Science Computer Review, 41(3), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211069662

  12. Flynn, S. (2022). Bridging the Age-based Digital Divide: An Intergenerational Exchange during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown Period in Ireland. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 20(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2022.2050334

  13. Foster, R. J. (2023). Tenuous Connectivity: Time, Citizenship, and Infrastructure in a Papua New Guinea Telecommunications Network. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 24(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2023.2177330

  14. Hernandez, K., & Faith, B. (2023). Online but still falling behind: Measuring barriers to internet use 'after access'. Internet Policy Review, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1713

  15. Hoyos Muñoz, J. A., & Cardona Valencia, D. (2023). Trends and challenges of digital divide and digital inclusion: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221148366

  16. Joshi, D., Panagiotou, A., Bisht, M., Udalagama, U., & Schindler, A. (2023). Digital Ethnography? Our Experiences in the Use of SenseMaker for Understanding Gendered Climate Vulnerabilities amongst Marginalized Agrarian Communities. Sustainability, 15(9), 7196. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su15097196

  17. Kemppainen, L., Wrede, S., & Kouvonen, A. (2023). Migrants face barriers to obtaining electronic identification: A population-based study among older Russian-speakers in Finland. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01940-5

  18. Kumar, S. K. A., Crawford, D., & Stewart, R. (2023). Pricing Models for 5G Multi-Tenancy using Game Theory Framework. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000490

  19. Kumi-Yeboah, A., Kim, Y., & Armah, Y. E. (2023). Strategies for overcoming the digital divide during the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education institutions in Ghana. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13356

  20. Mathrani, A., Umer, R., Sarvesh, T., & Adhikari, J. (2023). Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study. Societies, 13(5), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ soc13050122

  21. Morse, T. E., Habib, A., Hornby, G., & Evans, W. (2022). The Efficacy of Flipped Classrooms: An Investigation of the Views of an International Cohort of Teacher Educators. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221076080

  22. Peluso, D. (2023). The Digital Divide and Futurist Imaginings of Zelle‐ous Resistors. Social Inclusion, 11(3), 41–50.

  23. Pierce, P., Whitten, M., & Hillman, S. (2023). The impact of digital healthcare on vulnerable pregnant women: A review of the use of the MyCare app in the maternity department at a central London tertiary unit. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1155708. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1155708

  24. Pruet, P., Ang, C. S., & Farzin, D. (2016). Understanding tablet computer usage among primary school students in underdeveloped areas: Students' technology experience, learning styles and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1131–1144.

  25. Qureshi, I., Pan, S. L., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Digital social innovation: An overview and research framework. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 1097–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12291

  26. Sharifi, A., Ahmadi, M., Mehni, M. A., Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., & Pourasad, Y. (2021). Experimental and numerical diagnosis of fatigue foot using convolutional neural network. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 24(16), 1828-1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12319

  27. Wallengren Lynch, M., Dominelli, L., & Cuadra, C. (2023). Information Communication Technology during Covid-19. Social Work Education, 42(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2040977

  28. Wilson, G., Gates, J. R., Vijaykumar, S., & Morgan, D. J. (2023). Understanding older adults' use of social technology and the factors influencing use. Ageing and Society, 43(1), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000490

  29. Yoo, N., & Jang, S. H. (2023). Digital technology use, technological self-efficacy, and subjective well-being among North Korean migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderated moderation. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231171503

  30. Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Dasgupta, R. K., & Xia, R. (2022). Narrowing the age-based digital divide: Developing digital capability through social activities. Information Systems Journal, 33(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12400